Reflections of Fulvia Bandol (Left and Freedom) on terremotoCondividi
Yesterday at 10:19 in Italy
Building a shared culture of the territory as a common good, which if well managed guarantees public safety (the safety is not just public order and combating crime, but has many other meanings, that of living in the territories, schools, homes and hospitals SAFE is one of them and it is essential). But the territory also ensures the wealth for a country like Italy which has tourism as one of his first quality resources things and therefore preserved the sea coasts of the historical and cultural heritage centers.
To say this culture some things are important:
times against in any way illegal building and especially in the South where there are more numerous and dangerous seismic areas. They never made huge mistakes and were therefore the various amnesties of unauthorized building (only two in the last 15 years) because they did grow houses and structures where it should not be. The best example is the macroscopic area of \u200b\u200bVesuvius and Campi Flegrei, where the slopes of the volcano live at risk of life around 900,000 people.
not eat, cement, other agricultural land. Italy is one of the most cemented in Europe (and with the highest per capita cement consumption per capita .... most of the U.S.) and therefore highly waterproof and therefore more at risk when it rains, even normally, because the agricultural land that can absorb water is increasingly scarce.
abolish the maximum discount contracts that are a real cancer on the quality of construction and public works, an incentive to hurt the works .. because he won the contract to the company that makes the lowest bid (and make it as low save on materials, cement ... armature does not meet earthquake standards ..).. . except then review the costs again and again during construction and to give as a final result of rising costs and huge long lead times (a recent example is the hospital and painful side of the Eagle 9 times more than was the initial estimate and built in biblical times)
sure that buildings are constructed in compliance with earthquake standards. ... rules and laws, but there was no earthquake in the last 15 years we have made, then the problem is their application. Who should check? Local administrators, civil engineering but has been virtually ousted from the checks, and finally even the judiciary. There is much talk of streamlining procedures to streamline and sometimes you miss checks are vital to public safety. You can not say on Monday that the procedures should be streamlined, and a week later, facing a disaster, complaining about the controls that are missing. Until we resolve all the structural problems of the area we can not let our guard down on the controls. And this should be said and done once and for all.
Create a single authority to control the territory
today the ministry is to the geological environment, the seismic civil defense, the dams have been dismantled
Two rules for Reconstruction:
recover as much as possible and not build everything from scratch in different places.
Berlusconi proposes to do around New Town Eagle ... new small towns, new "Milano 2" (an experiment that may work in Milan, but maybe not here .... andrebbbero made here as some have proposed houses with decent wood for the displaced should be rebuilt and the city's historic center, because it is the culture of that city, its roots, its history which should be recovered to restore identity to those who have lost.
Contain and quickly define the areas affected decide on the reconstruction work to be done to quantify the resources required and to monitor how funds are managed
Unfortunately an earthquake is almost always a deal that lasts for decades .... slowly enlarges the area to aid and works that are have nothing to do with the reconstruction .... the ultimate example is St. Julian .... collapsed a school but only a few months later and still a very large area was and is involved in reconstruction projects, including a mega viaduct still not finished and of no use, except for the company that is building .... but the same can be said for the Belice receiving more aid for unspecified works .....
Clarifying what a great work in a civilized and modern ...
is not a "great work" in size or the amount of contracts that moves ... is one that affects millions of people and their quality of life, and that does make a difference and civilization throughout the country .
Securing public and private buildings, rebuild the water systems that have a century, sewerage and drainage (remember the landslide of Sarno, who was so devastating because it lacked modern drains?), Reforestation with trees that have special solid roots in the soil. ... This is a great public work and that of which Italy has more urgent needs.
is why we believe the largest public works project ever for Italy (and we say this for several decades) is the safety of the area from seismic hazards, hydrological and volcanic. A work that affects millions of people, almost half of the Italian population, which would work and employment, which would give security to those who did not ever had one, that would save lives, and that would also allow firms to diversify, building models quality as in many other countries around the world. A greatest work and civilian high in the sense of the word does not exist.
For this reason (to start putting his hand to this great public work priority) we have proposed and propose to begin the transfer to the reconstruction of Abruzzo and to the safety of schools and hospitals in all seismic areas of public funds already allocated to the bridge over the Strait. Not to reopen an ideological debate that would only be tedious. Even if it were feasible and environmentally and financially sustainable (and in our opinion it is not but according to others it may be) this book is definitely not a priority. It is not if we begin to solve huge structural gap and base. We, unlike the center-right, we propose other priorities because resources are limited and a government and a state must be able to make clear choices and on behalf of millions of citizens.
The housing plan proposed by the government was wrong before the earthquake and ci voleva un terremoto per capirlo , gli incentivi fiscali o i bonus non vanno dati per aumentare le cubature ma per mettere a norma sismica le abitazioni o per il risparmio energetico, per questo continuiamo a chiedere con precise proposte che quel piano cambi radicalmente. Guardiamo all’esempio del Friuli, una regione che dopo il terremoto ha ricostruito bene e in fretta ma dando agevolazioni rigorosamente solo a seguito di adeguamenti antisismici.
Noi proponiamo un PIANO DECENNALE PER LA MESSA IN SICUREZZA DEL TERRITORIO DA TUTTI I RISCHI, CHE PREVEDA MOMENTI DI VERIFICA ANNUALE DELLO STATO DI AVANZAMENTO DA PARTE DEL PARLAMENTO, UNITAMENTE ALLE REGIONI. SEMBRA UNA DATA LONTANA MA PER UN PAESE CHE NON E’ MAI PARTITO LA COSA IMPORTANTE is departing and arriving conclusion at a certain date. ALTHOUGH see there SERVE TWENTY YEARS IT IS ALWAYS AN ORDER OF MAGNITUDE IS ACCEPTABLE .... 80-90 YEARS IN RELATION TO THE PROPERTY THAT WE HAVE TO SHOULDER. TO SAY THAT WE WORK WHY 'Fifteen years an earthquake or a flood has ceased to be' victims seems to me a huge thing.
spending to secure is a huge expense but to intervene in the valley, after the disaster, it costs even more. Impressive figures certainly cost us over a century or even in the last 50 years. So we economists say. ... Not just the environmentalists. If we had started the safety and the prevention of ten or twenty or thirty years ago eventually we would have saved many lives, so much land and money. And today we would have a country more secure and happier people. How do economists say if nothing is done on prevention should be made in the annual so-called "COST OF DAMAGE EXPECTED" because unfortunately it is obvious that every year one or two floods, earthquake, landslide and some will be predictable.
spending the safety is not just a cost of civilization, and to safeguard the lives of citizens and their safety but is also a good economic investment in the long term.
Numerical Data (Source: Civil Protection, Eurispes, Cnr)
Map summary of the risk (Italy is after California and Japan the third area of \u200b\u200bthe world at risk), 40% of the population (over 25 million people) live in areas at risk, 64% of buildings were constructed before seismic standards and classifications.
Seismic risk
200 destructive earthquakes since the year 1000 more than 121,000 victims in the last century
In 1908 Messina Let us recall some 85,000 victims in 1915 Avezzano
32,000 victims in 1968
Belice
300 victims in 1976 Friuli In 1980, 970 victims
2750 Irpinia victims
today Abruzzo with more than 270 victims per 120,000
Damage miliardi di lire ( 62 miliardi euro) solo negli ultimi 20 anni
Rischio idrogeologico
5400 alluvioni e 11.400 frane negli ultimi 80 anni
La calabria ha l’82% del suo territorio a rischio, la Liguria il 69%, la Sicilia il 60%, le marche l’84%, la Toscana il 61%,, l’emilia il 45%, il Friuli il 53% il Piemonte il 38% ...e cosi via…..
30.000 miliardi di lire di danni solo negli ultimi 20 anni In ottantanni la cifra si quadruplica.
100 vittime solo negli ultimi 3 anni, ma nel 93 per esempio solo in un anno ci furono 343 vittime.
A reggio Calabria si continua a costruire nel letto delle fiumare, un anno fa il paesino di Cavallerizzo, prov Cosenza, fu inghiottito da una frana, sul Po continuano estrazioni abusive di inerti e nell’area di esondazione del Piave ci sono vari importanti insediamenti industriali.
Rischio Vulcanico
2 milioni di persone vivono in aree a rischio vulcanico
delle quali 1 milione solo nell’area Vesuvio e Campi Flegrei.
Altri dati:
La protezione civile calcola che siano 80.000 gli EDIFICI PUBBLICI vulnerabili( scuole, ospedali, uffici, caserme) a cui si aggiungono strade ponti e ferrovie.
Le SCUOLE edificate in aree a rischio sono 22.000 ( 16.000 delle quali in aree ad altissimo risk and of these 9,000 have not been manufactured in compliance with seismic criteria). It means that about 8-9 million children every morning coming into classes where there are no safety requirements prescribed by law. To ensure the safety of schools served 4 billion €, which is currently been allocated by the CIPE
only 494 million euro to intervene in schools around 1500 to 9000. Of all the Italian schools only 32 per cent certificates of fitness for use static. (8 in the Abruzzo, 51%, 31% in Lombardy, Piedmont, 38% and so on ...) Legambiente published data on the Sun 24 hours.
hospitals from making rule in areas at risk are 500
To these are added about 7 million of private houses at risk.
3 million Italians living in areas of high seismicity, seismicity 21 million in average, 15 low seismicity, seismic activity at least 20 million.
