REVOLUTION? At the bottom left! Today at 12:03
Franceschini is a candidate to lead the PD. I'm glad. And
'his prerogative.
This fact sets in motion the thoughts in my head which I will make
participates, even if innocent
logorrhea of \u200b\u200bmy letters.
One of the first thoughts was that it has opened a new
election campaign, this time inside the PD.
Campaigns, you know, stop everything that is real
political activity. In
election campaign talk, promises, si spiega,
si va in giro, si raccolgono consensi...si fa di tutto
tranne che fare Politica, quella vera, quella dei fatti,
quella delle azioni per migliorare la cosa pubblica, a
favore della comunità, cioè anche per noi.
Si pronuncia infatti,durante le campagne elettorali, la
seguente frase: “datemi il voto, così finalmente potrò
realizzare tutte le promesse che vi sto facendo, perché
adesso, che il vostro voto non ce l'ho, non posso fare
niente”.
Che è anche un ottimo modo per non impegnarsi troppo se
si perde.
E' stato detto: “senza voti non posso mantenere le promesse”.
So now that I lost, I am free to do what I wanted to do
earlier.
All this worries me.
Also because, if I have to rely on a party that
face opposition, which makes proposals that will build
alternatives, choose one with several million votes,
with a real force mobilization, resulting
great communication skills,
with a serious chance of being able to govern ...
choose one way, but I can not. .. Yes, because if
first was during the election campaign, then had to clarify
inside, then again in
election campaign, when it will begin to make policy?
Then I came another thought. Want to see the good
Franceschini nostalgia of the old DC?
And you see that Bersani nostalgia of the DS?
Some of the base, which will vote in the primaries,
bet you will also have nostalgia for the old PCI .. In short, an amalgam
not too successful.
a kind of mayonnaise "crazy" ...
I see on the horizon scenarios. PD
A politically weak and flattened on
centrist positions (ideological, non-numeric),
closer to an absorption of UDC
positions, I do not know how to consume, as
you outline. Or driving with a PD
Bersani, unable to move because
plagued by internal factions that will do anything to undermine
. With Rutelli not be able to do with it
a reason to have a secretary of a common origin
and feel more comfortable with friends of the PDL ....
short, I am not convinced that the PD will survive.
And sincerely believe, and I believed in the birth of PD.
of a large part of the reform of the labels,
seeks to innovate the country.
I just bought the box. An innovative, revolutionary
, which could not be without it.
Then I opened the package and read the instructions. It was written in large
:
the inventor of this product disclaims all warranties
indeed not even recognize the product. Signed Prodi.
declined then followed the same sentence differently,
signed by all participants in the project.
I had some doubts.
I closed the box. I'm back in the section.
And I have not found any more. Only a sign:
closed for local sale.
And they came to me the first doubts. Then try
around.
Someone who I replace the box or at least having
alternatives, equally interesting.
But there is crisis.
also
Crisis offer. The products are Vecchiotti.
Many already do not work at the time of purchase.
What to do? It is said that to get new products
you should invest in research.
must investigate, test and research.
But it seems that you want to entrust the design of the new product
the designer of the dune.
hard but think to be able to create something beautiful and innovative
... In short .. if there is a
accustomed to certain things is not easy to change.
Back to my thoughts, that vortex
overlap and merge.
I said No to the PD. In any sauce.
I also said that I have doubts on a New Left
written by an Old Left.
I am a little worried about what happens in
PRC and the Party of Italian Communists.
I heard that Rizzo wants to build yet another
Communist Party, but has been careful to point out that
is an innovative project such as the Duna station.
Diliberto often seems to be true ... piduista,
not be true. Maybe there's a conspiracy.
But I return to a consideration
left open at the beginning.
Not that the initial error is thinking that today
people vote for the flag?
It's not that today people want to choose something
valido, di credibile, un partito, un'idea che non si
blocchi ogni volta sulle proprie contraddizioni?
Non è forse che oggi non esiste più un “elettorato
cattolico che vota cattolico”?
Perché se così non fosse non si capirebbe come ci sia
un Presidente del Consiglio vittima di forti invidie
nei confronti del proprietario di Playboy,
perché l'UDC porti a casa poche manciate di voti,
E non si capirebbe perché il 30% degli italiani non
voti (mica pochi).
Allora forse il problema risiede altrove. Risiede nella
necessità forte di capire come è possibile essere
“ecologisti” and produce cars for example (but
are environmentally friendly and recyclable, someone would answer.
add: "Of course we had to pollute a little
to extract the metal, a lot for work, then
if for reasons of labor costs, some to save
has spilled waste processing in
ground, it is not our fault, of course, we could pay more
work, etc ... but would cost too
your car. We did te.Da
which shows that if a worker dies because
to save time and money there were adequate safety measures
was my fault!)
The problem therefore lies in
that if we accept the facts, we can not avoid having to think
new economic systems, different and antithetical
the current one, where the models
Latin America (the "South American models" were those of dictators
years 70.
left now prefers the term "Latin America" \u200b\u200bis more respectful ...
) antagonists in the face of the forums, but all
are certainly not mutually exclusive.
But reshape an economy, an alternative system,
ecologist, waste so that even the principle of exploitation
"acceptable", which refuses
the basic concept of the current economy "to produce
for consumption, consuming to produce, it also means
to question at least a century of struggle
union, and certainly the current union system. Critically re-read Marx
means, but until last
line, or at least the Communist Manifesto, and
understand them, there was a description of the disease
but not a cure.
It does not provide the care, there is evidence, much less the
Leninism and its various appendages.
E 'must go further.
leak that Catholicism did not accept the capitalist economic system
until it's
Pope John Paul the second. Understanding that faith Communist
it is absolutely wrong, but it requires the overcoming of
itself, for the construction of a new social project
. If
new left must be, it can only be born physically and intellectually by enfranchising
old cultural shackles in which it is beached. But
need new people, are intellectuals, serves
culture, need to read those tomes of philosophy
in Italy have never arrived, that the left has always
boycotted.
The Left today is not in crisis "because it left".
The Left today is in crisis because it has stopped his clock
in the seventies.
not understood how the world was changing and devolving
same.
now has to change, and it must make the revolution.
Its on the inside. A true revolution, physiological. So please
: dear old fellow a thousand battles
, tell your leaders:
"make yourself safe. Now. Get away. Expatriate. "
Because if you will be overwhelmed by this revolution
left you will get hurt.
****************************************
****************************************
http://www.gesef.it/grafica/ANI-Bruno-Bozzetto.gif
*************************
0 comments:
Post a Comment